On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 09:22:06AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:58:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> +#define VIR_EXEC_FDSET_SIZE() (sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX)/8)
> +#define VIR_EXEC_FDSET_CLEAR(set) memset((set), 0, VIR_EXEC_FDSET_SIZE())
> +#define VIR_EXEC_FDSET_ON(set, fd) (set[(fd)/8] |= (1 << ((fd)%8)))
> +#define VIR_EXEC_FDSET_OFF(set, fd) (set[(fd)/8] &= ~(1 << ((fd)%8)))
> +#define VIR_EXEC_FDSET_ISON(set, fd) (set[(fd)/8] & (1 << ((fd)%8)))
+1 although I'm interested to know why you didn't just use ordinary
FD_SETs for this.
For some reason I have it in my head that fd_set was limited to 32
but looking at the Linux source its clearly 1024, which is the sme
as my _SC_OPEN_MAX. The manpage says its FD_SETSIZE, but doesn't
clarify whether FD_SETSIZE is guarenteed to be large enough to store
any FD upto _SC_OPEN_MAX.
Jim, any thoughts on this ? I'll happily switch to fd_set if we expect
it'll be suitable
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|