Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:15:08PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
...
> I guess it makes sense to minimize disruption for those working
on
> head and lower the time needed to get those fix in for those who catch
> and fix them ;-)
> Opinions ?
Yes, this is reasonable idea - its crazy to wait for ACKs on the list
to fix 1-2 line typos in the code which break compilation.
I think so too, and have just committed this:
build: exempt *.ico files from the trailing blank check
* .x-sc_trailing_blank: Add \.ico$ to the list.