On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 05:45:31AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
wrote:
> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak(a)gnome.org>
>
> ---
> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c | 7 +++++++
> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.h | 1 +
> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c
b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c
> index 9a1648a..2e4a69a 100644
> --- a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c
> +++ b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ GList *gvir_config_domain_os_get_boot_devices(GVirConfigDomainOs
*os)
> return devices;
> }
>
> +const char *gvir_config_domain_os_get_arch(GVirConfigDomainOs *os)
> +{
g_return_val_if_fail(GVIR_CONFIG_IS_DOMAIN_OS(os), NULL);
ACK with this added. Is it fine to return NULL when no arch is specified,
or would it be better to return something else?
I'm not very sure about returing default values in general since thats
very much a policy decision and we are not giving any clue to the app
that we are making the decision for it. Just saying I'm not sure, not
that I actually have a strong opinion either way.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124