Re: [libvirt PATCH v2 6/9] gitlab: add x86_64 native CI jobs

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:47:01PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Tue, 2020-03-24 at 16:24 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > To control the total CI execution time, we split the native jobs into > > two distinct stages. A representative set of distros are used as the > > primary native build sanity test, run for everyone regardless of whether > > pre/post merge, and on any branch. The remaining distros are set to run > > after the cross builds, and only execute for master branch, and thus > > will only run for post-merge. When we switch to using a merge request > > workflow, these extra jobs can be triggered when the merge request is > > opened. > > I don't get the rationale behind the split. > > Right now we're not using merge requests, but we're limiting the > number of jobs for the merge request case; at the same time, we say > that once we switch to a MR-based workflow, we're going to run the > extra jobs on each merge request as well. So what does the > distinction buy us? With this split today, if I push to my private fork, then the reduced set of jobs run. This gives quick turnaround for developers developing patches. When it gets reviewed & pushed to master, the full set run post merge. In the future, when we switch to merge requests, we'll change it so that the full set run when the merge request is opened, instad of post-merge. What is run for developers private branches will remain the same > I think a better split would be: > > * pick a selection of jobs that includes both native and cross > build, across various distros of different vintage, such that > they can all run without waiting on shared runners. This can be > used by developers as a reasonably quick (~20 minutes) smoke > test while working on a feature; "without waiting on shared runners" is undefined, as whether you wait & how long, is dependant on many things outside our control. As notedin the cover letter though, this minimal set of native + cross build jobs gives about a 35 min turn around based on load I see today. I think that's acceptably fast.