On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 16:48:52 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
---
src/util/virstring.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virstring.c b/src/util/virstring.c
index 3da793c87a..6add2278d8 100644
--- a/src/util/virstring.c
+++ b/src/util/virstring.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
#include <config.h>
#include <glib/gprintf.h>
-#include <regex.h>
#include <locale.h>
#include "c-ctype.h"
@@ -1089,24 +1088,19 @@ bool
virStringMatch(const char *str,
const char *regexp)
{
- regex_t re;
- int rv;
+ g_autoptr(GRegex) regex = NULL;
+ g_autoptr(GError) err = NULL;
VIR_DEBUG("match '%s' for '%s'", str, regexp);
- if ((rv = regcomp(&re, regexp, REG_EXTENDED | REG_NOSUB)) != 0) {
- char error[100];
- regerror(rv, &re, error, sizeof(error));
- VIR_WARN("error while compiling regular expression '%s': %s",
- regexp, error);
- return false;
+ regex = g_regex_new(regexp, 0, 0, &err);
+ if (!regex) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("Failed to compile regex %s"), err->message);
+ return -1;
The function returns bool.
Additionally there is one non-test use of this function. Do you think we
should open-code it instead?
}
- rv = regexec(&re, str, 0, NULL, 0);
-
- regfree(&re);
-
- return rv == 0;
+ return g_regex_match(regex, str, 0, NULL);
}
With the return value/error case sorted out:
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>