On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 05:10:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:08:26PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The code for dealing with the paravirt framebuffer was missing code to deal
> > with an explicit vncdisplay=N setting - only working for vncunused=1. It
> > was also not flexible enough in processing the 2 different styles of FB
> > config.
>
> I'm not sure I undertand the logic for setting the port, why going
> whould xenstore there ?
I'm not sure what you mean - xenstore isn't involved in this. This is
for taking the XML and writing out the /etc/xen config - the port stuff
is basically making sure that port="5903" is translated into the config
option 'vncdisplay=3'. Previously only port="-1" was working.
Whoops reread, yeah, I don't understand why I saw a xenstore operation there !
weird ...
Okay +1
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/