On 11/15/22 23:16, Eric Garver wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:03:21AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 11/15/22 5:21 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
>> On 11/10/22 17:31, Eric Garver wrote:
>>> This series further improves the firewalld backend by converting to a
>>> fully native implementation for NAT and routed networks. That is, there
>>> are no iptables rules added by libvirt when the running firewalld is
>>> 0.9.0 or later.
>>>
>>> The major advantage is that firewalld users can use firewall-cmd to
>>> filter the VM traffic and apply their own policies.
>>>
>>> When firewalld < 0.9.0 is present only the "libvirt" zone will
be used.
>>> The new "libvirt-nat" and "libvirt-routed" zones are not
used. This
>>> maintains compatibility for older distributions (e.g. Ubuntu 20.04).
>>>
>>> Patch 1 is a bug fix for my previous series to avoid a bogus error log.
>>>
>>> Patches 2-3 converts the routed network to native firewalld.
>>>
>>> Patches 4-8 converts the NAT network to native firewalld. It also
>>> introduces the "libvirt-nat" zone.
>>>
>>> Eric Garver (8):
>>> util: virFirewallDGetPolicies: gracefully handle older firewalld
>>> network: firewalld: add networkAddHybridFirewallDRules()
>>> network: firewalld: use native routed networks
>>> util: add virFirewallDSourceSetZone()
>>> util: add virFirewallDApplyPolicyRichRules()
>>> network: firewalld: add zone for NAT networks
>>> network: firewalld: add policies for NAT networks
>>> network: firewalld: use native NAT networks
>>>
>>> libvirt.spec.in | 2 +
>>> src/libvirt_private.syms | 2 +
>>> src/network/bridge_driver_linux.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> src/network/libvirt-nat-out.policy | 13 ++
>>> src/network/libvirt-nat.zone | 10 ++
>>> src/network/libvirt-to-host.policy | 1 +
>>> src/network/meson.build | 10 ++
>>> src/util/virfirewalld.c | 79 +++++++++++-
>>> src/util/virfirewalld.h | 6 +
>>> 9 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 src/network/libvirt-nat-out.policy
>>> create mode 100644 src/network/libvirt-nat.zone
>>>
>>
>> Patches look good to me. You have my:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
>>
>> but I'll wait a bit for Laine, if he wants to express his opinion.
>
> This series has been on my list of things I need to get to since it arrived,
> but I've been purposefully not responding in order to avoid distracting my
> brain from something else I'm working on that is more urgent (supporting
> passt as a guest interface connection mode).
>
> I have pending stuff (in-process on and off for many months now) that adds a
> separate (configurable) backend for raw nftables that this firewalld-backend
> mode needs to mesh with. In particular, I don't think it's safe to
> automatically switch to using a pure firewalld backend any time firewalld is
> running, because behavior isn't exactly the same as the standard iptables
> backend (the first example that comes to mind is those horrible dhcp
> checksum munging rules that are added by libvirt's iptables backend).
>
> Probably most of the patches in this series will be untouched by mine, or
> should be prerequisites to mine, but some will need to be re-jiggered to use
> my conf-file option and to deal with my other reorganizations. I'll look at
> it in more detail as soon as I have a first version of passt patches posted,
> which I'm hoping will happen sometime this week.
>
> So please don't push these patches (yet).
Please take the first patch now. I can resend individually if you'd
like.
The rest we can sort out and re-spin after your series.
Yeah, the first patch is independent of the rest so unless there's any
objection from Laine or Dan I'll push it later today.
Michal