On 03/09/2010 09:22 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 09:03 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> The AUTHORS files indicates the list of people with commit acces right
>> who can actually merge the patches.
>>
>> -The general rule for commiting patches is to make sure it has been reviewed
>> -properly in the mailing-list first, usually if a couple of persons gave an
>> +The general rule for commiting a patch is to make sure it has been reviewed
>> +properly in the mailing-list first, usually if a couple of people gave an
>
> Sorry for not spotting it sooner, but s/commiting/committing/ (2 t's)
No problem.
I made a quick pass through it and fixed a bunch more:
Actually, the whole point is that HACKING and docs/hacking.html.in are
more or less duplicates of one another, and someone volunteered to make
HACKING be autogenerated from the html version. Therefore, patching
HACKING is not worth much (otherwise I would have patched both files in
the first place); but your grammar change to go from 'committing
patches' to 'committing a patch' should be flowed back to the html version.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org