Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] news: Update release notes

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 14:08:29 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Signed-off-by: --help <mprivozn(a)redhat.com&gt; Hmm. > --- > docs/news.xml | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml > index 86a0c8d18..53bf9a49c 100644 > --- a/docs/news.xml > +++ b/docs/news.xml > @@ -44,6 +44,28 @@ > using the <code>cachetune</code> element in <code>cputune</code>. > </description> > </change> > + <change> > + <summary> > + Allow opening secondary drivers > + </summary> > + <description> > + Up until now it was possible to connect to only hypervisor drivers > + (e.g. qemu:///system, lxc:///, vbox:///system, and so on). The > + internal drivers (like network driver, node device driver, etc.) were > + hidden from users and users could use them only indirectly. Starting > + with this release new connection URIs are accepted. For instance > + network:///system, storage:///system and so on. > + </description> Isn't this an internal change not really used for consumption of clients?

> + </change> > + <change> > + <summary> > + virtlogd, virtlockd: Add support for admin protocol > + </summary> > + <description> > + These two daemons now support admin protocol through which some admin > + info can be gathered or some configuration tweaked on the fly. > + </description> > + </change> > </section> > <section title="Improvements"> > <change> > @@ -82,8 +104,88 @@ > libxl: add support for setting clock offset and adjustment > </summary> > </change> > + <change> > + <summary> > + Make port allocator global > + </summary> > + <description> > + Up until now each driver had their own port allocator module. This > + meant that info on port usage was not shared. Starting with this > + release, the port allocator module is made global and therefore > + drivers allocate ports from global pool. > + </description> > + </change> > + <change> > + <summary> > + src: Enable building with GCC 8.0 > + </summary> > + <description> > + GCC 8.0 added more warnings which found some genuine problems with our code. > + </description> I'm not sure whether that improved anything. Also wasn't that gcc 7?