On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:59:20PM +0000, David Lutterkort wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 21:32 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> How do you deal with IPv6 currently ?
With lots of Aspirin (actually, not at all)
> I was thinking of sugesting an attribute
>
> <ip type="ipv6" address="2001:23::2"
prefix="24"/>
>
> but I think its possibly better to have a different element name
>
> <ip6 address="2001:23::2" prefix="24"/>
>
> since the former would not work if we ever needed to worry about
> non-IP based addresses.
Either works for me, with a slight preference for the first version, on
purely esthetic grounds. And even if we go with that, there's nothing
keeping us from adding an <ipx> element as an alternative to the <ip>
element in the future.
Or a 3rd option is to group addresses by family
<addresses family='ipv4'>
<ip address='122.0.0.3' prefix='24'/>
<ip address='24.24.224.4' prefix='24'/>
</addresses>
<addresses family='ipv6'>
<ip address='2001:23::2' prefix='48'/>
<ip address='fe:33:55::33' prefix='64'/>
</addresses>
<adddresses family='ipx'>
<ipx address='2423.4521.66.3.252.'/>
</address>
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|