On 05/17/2010 01:49 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
On 05/14/2010 04:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> virFileResolveLink was returning a positive value on error,
> thus confusing callers that assumed failure was < 0. The
> confusion is further evidenced by callers that would have
> ended up calling virReportSystemError with a negative value
> instead of a valid errno.
>
> Fixes Red Hat BZ #591363.
>
> * src/util/util.c (virFileResolveLink): Live up to documentation.
> * src/qemu/qemu_security_dac.c
> (qemuSecurityDACRestoreSecurityFileLabel): Adjust callers.
> * src/security/security_selinux.c
> (SELinuxRestoreSecurityFileLabel): Likewise.
> * src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c
> (virStorageBackendDiskDeleteVol): Likewise.
Yep, makes lots of sense.
ACK
Thanks; pushed.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org