On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:33:21PM +0100, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
I guess Dan did a more complete review of the code than mine. One of the issues I had was many pieces of code licenced under the MIT Licence, which is compatible with the LGPL, but I must admit that if you are the authors of that code I would prefer just LGPL. I also saw parts which were MIT but allowed to relicence under LGPL, for the sake of uniformity I would prefer all files provided under LGPLv2 like the other parts of libvirt code. In a sense it's equivalent for you, but for people doing the legal review when trying to embbed libvirt this makes things more complicated. Any chance you could fix all those headers ?
I have fixed all headers to be LGPLv2.1 :)
Ah, that's good news :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/