Jim Fehlig wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
> Hmm. These two new values are only valid for on_crash, but I don't see
> any code that rejects them for on_reboot or on_poweroff. Do we need a
> separate enum here, or do we just need to add better checking to the
> remaining clients to detect enum values they can't support?
>
>
Good point. I moved these new options into a new enum and adjusted the
code accordingly.
V2 attached.
Any comments on V2 of this patch?
Regards,
Jim