On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:12:12AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 07/14/2017 05:28 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
>>>> cleanup:
>>>> - if (obj)
>>>> - virNodeDeviceObjUnlock(obj);
>>>> + virNodeDeviceObjEndAPI(&obj);
>>>> testDriverUnlock(driver);
>>>> virNodeDeviceDefFree(def);
>>>> virObjectUnref(dev);
>>>> @@ -5596,13 +5595,13 @@ testNodeDeviceDestroy(virNodeDevicePtr dev)
>>>> * taken, so we have to dup the parent's name and drop the
lock
>>>> * before calling it. We don't need the reference to the
object
>>>> * any more once we have the parent's name. */
>>>
>>> Not that this patch would be touching it directly, but ^this commentary is
>>> pretty much useless now, since @parent_name is useless in this function,
>>> nodeDeviceDestroy doesn't work that way anymore.
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>
>> Hmmm, I see said the blind man. Looks like commit id '7ad479d0b'
should
>> have removed @parent_name as well.
>>
>> That should be a separate patch - I can create and add it to the end.
>
> Sure, that was the expected outcome :), judging by a quick look at the hunk
> only, I don't see a problem having such patch at the beginning of the series,
> do you hit any merge conflicts?
>
> Erik
>
Yes multiple... Mainly because I changed the comment. I could add it
immediately after this patch without conflicts.
Disregard my comment then and proceed with your proposal.
Erik