Re: [Libvirt] VNC auth per VM

Daniel P. Berrange schrieb: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote: > >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everybody, >>>> >>>> I encountered the following problem. I want my users to only be able to >>>> connect to their own virtual machines via VNC. Is there any way to do so? >>>> >>> The VNC authentication setup is currently being done per-host, so there >>> is no way to define ACLs per-(user,vm) tuple as you describe. >>> >> What about the VNC password? >> That's per-VM, isn't it? >> > > That is true by I don't really consider VNC password to be useful. It is > utterly insecure. If you want to have plain passwords, then its better to > use the new SASL authentication method, with its Digest-MD5 plugin. That > is still not top-grade security, but it is better then VNC password and > allows configuration of arbitrary Username+pasword pairs.. At which point > we just need ACLs against the usernames. SASL also provide Kerberos auth, > where we can do an ACL against the Kerberos principle name. And VeNCrypt > provides TLS+x509 certificates which you can either layer SASL over again, > or require client x509 certs and do an ACL against the client CNAME Ok, so let me sumarize: It is possible to define username+password pairs via SASL. SASL can also sync with Kerberos. So the only problem left is, that there is no way to assign a specific username to a VM. So, what we need is a plugin, where we have an username and a virtual machine as input and we need to refuse the connection, if this pair is not valid. The VNC Server is part of libvirt, so the perfect method to add this functionallity would be the VNC Servers authenticate or start method. However, a Windows user is still not able to connect as there is no windows vnc client capable of doing SASL.