On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:34:52 +0200, Menno Lageman wrote:
On 04/06/2020 10:38, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:42:43 +0200, Menno Lageman wrote:
> > Format the address width attribute. Depending on the version of
> > QEMU it is named 'aw-bits' or 'x-aw-bits'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Menno Lageman <menno.lageman(a)oracle.com>
> > ---
> > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 6 ++++
> > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 4 +++
> > src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 6 ++++
> > src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 9 ++++-
> > .../caps_2.12.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_3.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_3.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_4.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_4.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_4.2.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_5.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_5.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../intel-iommu-aw-bits.x86_64-latest.args | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 1 +
> > 14 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/intel-iommu-aw-bits.x86_64-latest.args
> >
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> > index f12769635a86..fa305bf67f33 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> > @@ -582,6 +582,10 @@ VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virQEMUCaps,
> > "tcg",
> > "virtio-blk-pci.scsi.default.disabled",
> > "pvscsi",
> > +
> > + /* 370 */
> > + "intel-iommu.x-aw-bits",
>
> We definitely don't want to expose anythign with the experimental
> prefix.
>
> > + "intel-iommu.aw-bits",
>
> This is okay.
>
Ok, I'll remove x-aw-bits in v2.
For now there probably isn't a need to send a v2. The reviewer can
remove those bits before pushing if it's simple enough.
Is this 'we don't want to expose experimental stuff'
documented somewhere I
should have read?
I'm not sure if we explicitly document this somewhere. In general qemu's
stance is that they can remove or modify anything x-prefixed at any time
and we don't want to add support for such things until it's considered
stable by qemu.