Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 06:47:04PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This is a patch against CVS -- in other words, it includes the two
> previous patches I sent to this list today.
>
> Compared to the previous patch, it's just bug fixes and testing.
>
> Sorry, these patches are getting rather huge. Unfortunately I can't see
> any sensible way to split it up. For the most part you either have
> remote support or you don't.
Well I think we should start to review individual new files, especially
those whre you don't plan much changes until the final version, and then
commit them, this mean that we will be able to do most of the review
progressively, commit stuff progressively, even if the support is not there
yet when compiling. This will allow to review smaller chunks and then
we will finish with the actual patches to existing files, adding the
support finally.
That sounds like one way to go forward by digesting one chunk at a time.
Agreed - in the next version I'll split it up as you suggest.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF Mobile: +44 7866 314 421
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
Owens (Ireland)