On 5/11/21 12:37 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 5/5/21 4:02 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> The @cpus variable is an array of structs in which each item
> contains a virBitmap member. As such it is not enough to just
> VIR_FREE() the array - each bitmap has to be freed too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/conf/capabilities.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/capabilities.c b/src/conf/capabilities.c
> index 084e09286d..4d509a6d28 100644
> --- a/src/conf/capabilities.c
> +++ b/src/conf/capabilities.c
> @@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ virCapabilitiesHostNUMAInitReal(virCapsHostNUMA
> *caps)
> cleanup:
> virBitmapFree(cpumap);
> + virCapabilitiesClearHostNUMACellCPUTopology(cpus, ncpus);
There's some coding axiom about for every bug you fix you introduce
another ;-)...
Anyway Coverity notes you can get to cleanup from within the for loop
when ncpus < 0 and that will not be very good for this call. Yes, -1 can
no longer be returned, but -2 can be and we could fall to cleanup (at
least theoretically).
Another tweak could be to only check -2 and continue in the if statement
since -1 is no longer possible.
Unless I'm missing something that's just theoretical issue. Because
virCapabilitiesClearHostNUMACellCPUTopology() does check for cpus ==
NULL and only if it is not NULL then it looks at ncpus. And I don't see
how cpus could be !NULL and ncpus < 0 at the same time. But let me see
if there's something I can do.
Michal