ping? Beyond patch 1 which was reviewed. These are not uml specific, but rather more how domain objects are handled Tks - John On 04/02/2018 09:06 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
Patches 9-11 of larger series: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00489.html
Changes since v1:
* Patches 1 and 2 new - essentially they fix issues with how virDomainObjListRemove was used inconsistently.
* Patch 3 should be the same or very similar to the former patch 9: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00498.html
* Patch 4 should be the same as former patch 10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00499.html
* Patch 5 is altered to also fix virDomainObjListRemove inconsistencies
John Ferlan (5): uml: Fix umlProcessAutoDestroyDom dom processing uml: Fix umlInotifyEvent dom object handling uml: Create accessors to virDomainObjListFindByUUID uml: Add more specific error message on failed FindBy call uml: Use virDomainObjListFindBy{UUID|ID}Ref
src/uml/uml_driver.c | 353 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-)