Hi, On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 02:31:41PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
I am willing to work with Guido if you have some time to put into it. Otherwise the current implementation <interface type="foo"> models are pretty much 1:1 representations of what is in the C code and this looks pretty extensible to me. Have not seen any (or very few) copy-and-paste sections of code so it seems to be holding up currently. I will not try and speak for supporting the xml configuration long term, would appreciate some other perspectives. Lacking this I leave it up to the maintainer(s) to determine if this is worthy to go in. I see v1.2.19-rc2 has been put out there so a possible compromise (policy even?) is for this to go into v1.2.20-devel so people can play around with it. I assume implementations can be changed/reverted between releases v1.2.19 to v1.2.20. Completely understand the concern about supporting an interface for ever :)
From what I read in the thread going with "udp" is fine so let's stick to that if nobody has concerns. Cheers, -- Guido