
2 Apr
2013
2 Apr
'13
6:23 a.m.
On 04/01/2013 04:07 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
On 03/21/2013 11:42 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger<stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+ +char * +virTPMFindCancelPath(void) +{ + unsigned int idx; + int len; + DIR *pnp_dir; + char path[100], *p;
Is there any reason not to use PATH_MAX instead of 100 here?
You get a compiler error then due to the function using too much space on the stack. Stefan