Avi Kivity wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 04/09/09 16:03, Avi Kivity wrote:
I don't want multiplexed monitor sessions, at all.
I'm very happy to finally see them. Finally one can run vms with libvirt and *still* access the monitor for debugging and development purposes.
Right, I like them for that purpose as well. But not for ordinary control.
How do you want to differentiate? What further complications would this bring us?
I want async notifications added to a single monitor session. That too could be implemented today (as simple as a term_printf("notification: ...\n");
No. It is simple on the qemu side only. Parsing notifications poping up at random places in the stream is more complex.
I don't understand why, if there's a common prefix.
Everywhere you expect (qemu), also expect notification:.
Please no more async notifications to the monitors. They are just ugly to parse, at least for us humans. I don't want to see any notification in the middle of my half-typed command e.g. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux