Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] bridge_driver: use conffile for dnsmasq if it exists
2011/1/4 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
> I want to create isolated environment for guests - they will be
> connected to one bridge and will use private DNS data. No single
> packet from this isolated network can reach external network - this
> means no 53/udp traffic to resolvers defined in host's
> /etc/resolv.conf.
This sounds like a useful feature for libvirt to directly
support, rather than requiring a hack in a external config
file. eg, Some XML element to indicate whether to enable
DNS proxying or not.
yes, but it's only the first part of this useful feature.
next parts are dnsmasq options like --addn-hosts --no-hosts --server
--log-queries --local-ttl (and probably some more..)
OK. I'll be happy with following *hack*:
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index acd30d9..7107661 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ dnl We will hard-code paths to these programs
unless we cannot
dnl detect them, in which case we'll search for the program
dnl along the $PATH at runtime and fail if it's not there.
AC_PATH_PROG([DNSMASQ], [dnsmasq], [dnsmasq],
- [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH])
+ [/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:$PATH])
AC_PATH_PROG([RADVD], [radvd], [radvd],
[/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH])
AC_PATH_PROG([BRCTL], [brctl], [brctl],
--
Pawel