14 Nov
2012
14 Nov
'12
4:56 p.m.
On 11/14/2012 09:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 05:06:08PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
I've proposed both approaches in the past. However, none of them was accepted as we ought to agree on $subj first. Frankly, both makes sense to me, both has advantages and disadvantages.
IMHO, we should focus solely on interface address configuration and aim to provide an API equivalent to getifaddrs(3). This means
- Name - Type - Prefix - Address - Broadcast addresss or P2p destination address - Hardware address
and nothing more, in a fixed struct.
Using a fixed-size struct works for me as well. -- Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org