Re: [libvirt] Follow-up on .so version number question
On 07/07/2014 12:35 PM, Tony Asleson wrote:
Eric posted this a while back (ref:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-April/msg00226.html)
without any apparent response/discussion.
Can someone please elaborate on this?
At this point, we really aren't too worried about libtool versioning
scheme. We've kept our guarantee of library back-compat ever since that
email, with no complaints, so I'm not sure that changing anything now
makes any sense (I'm more worried about breaking status quo than I am
about violating libtool documentation suggestions)
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 604 bytes)