On 8/29/19 8:43 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:17 PM Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:21:58PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com>
>>
>> For each vhost-user GPUs,
>> - build a socket chardev, and pass the vhost-user socket to it
>> - build a vhost-user video device and associate it with the chardev
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>> index 8bef103f68..0e1d9510e5 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>> @@ -4672,8 +4672,15 @@ qemuBuildDeviceVideoStr(const virDomainDef *def,
>> goto error;
>> }
>>
>> - if (STREQ(model, "virtio-gpu")) {
>> - if (qemuBuildVirtioDevStr(&buf, "virtio-gpu", qemuCaps,
>
> Eww, why do we do a string comparison here when we store the model as an
> enum?
Yup, pre-existing. I suppose that can be fixed.
virDomainVideoType only has VIRTIO and not virtio-gpu vs virtio-vga;
that distinction depends on a few different criteria like arch and
primary vs secondary. So video->type isn't a drop in replacement here
>
>> + if (video->vhostuser) {
>> + if (STREQ(model, "virtio-vga"))
>> + model = "vhost-user-vga";
>> + if (STREQ(model, "virtio-gpu"))
>> + model = "vhost-user-gpu";
>> + }
>
> Not sure why we need to reassign model here instead of getting it right
> the first time.
>
>> +
>
> How different is the vhost-user-gpu device from virtio-gpu,
> don't we new a new VIDEO_TYPE_VHOST_USER instead?
From guest PoV, it's actually the same device. So we shouldn't
introduce a new virDomainVideoType, right? But we need a mapping to
-device, it has to be in libvirt qemu driver.
I agree that existing model='virtio' should cover it
- Cole