On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:57:28 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:45:29 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml index 86c7734694..79b5658cc3 100644 --- a/docs/news.xml +++ b/docs/news.xml @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ release. </description> </change> + <change> + <summary> + Removed support for VirtualBox versions < 5.0 + </summary> + <description> + Support for managing VirtualBox releases prior to 5.0 has + been dropped. The upstream project has declared that these + versions are end of life several years ago.
In some previous versions we had <section title="Removed features">.
Selling this as 'Improvement' is probably not entirely correct from users PoV.
Heh, ok. I thought forcing people off 5+ year old software was an improvement :-P
Generally that's true, butt when it breaks your setup you would not consider that an improvement :). ACK, but make sure that you run syntax-check prior to pushing. I'm not sure whether the schema for <summary> allows <.