Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 1/2] timer impl

On 12/15/2010 08:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/14/2010 07:34 PM, Wen Congyang wrote: > > In addition to Hu's comments, and the fact that you are probably going > to revise the exposed interface anyways, here's some additional points. One other point - how does this relate to the timeouts already implemented in places like daemon/event.c or src/util/event.c? Are those implementations already sufficient for your needs without having to write a new implementation? Or conversely, should your patch series be lengthened into rewriting those interfaces to take advantage of your new implementation in order to ease maintenance by focusing all timeout code into a single reusable interface? In other words, I'm still seeking a bit more justification for this patch.