On 12/17/12 00:15, Cole Robinson wrote:
> There's been a few bugs about an expected error from polkit:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873799
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872166
>
> The error is:
>
> Authorization requires authentication but no agent is available.
>
> The error means that polkit needs a password, but there is no polkit
> agent registered in your session. Polkit agents are the bit of UI that
> pop up and actually ask for your password.
>
> Preface the error with the string 'polkit:' so folks can hopefully
> make more sense of it.
> ---
> daemon/remote.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/daemon/remote.c b/daemon/remote.c
> index 41b8ea8..f85dae0 100644
> --- a/daemon/remote.c
> +++ b/daemon/remote.c
> @@ -2887,9 +2887,10 @@ error:
> if (authdismissed) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_AUTH_CANCELLED, "%s",
> _("authentication cancelled by user"));
> + } else if (pkout && *pkout) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_AUTH_FAILED, "polkit: %s", pkout);
This line fails syntax-check:
libvirt_unmarked_diagnostics
daemon/remote.c:2891: virReportError(VIR_ERR_AUTH_FAILED, "polkit: %s",
pkout);
It seems a bit unreasonable here, but you need to put the translation macro
there.
> } else {
> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_AUTH_FAILED, "%s",
> - pkout && *pkout ? pkout : _("authentication
failed"));
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_AUTH_FAILED, "%s", _("authentication
failed"));
> }
>
> VIR_FREE(pkout);
>
The change makes sense to me and I've also hit the error and had to look where
it comes from.
ACK once you make it pass syntax-check.
Peter