Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] Re: Supporting hypervisor specific APIs in libvirt

On 24/03/10 21:40, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> If so, what C clients you expected beyond libvirt? > > Users want a C API. I don't agree that libvirt is the only C > interface consumer out there. (I've seen this written too many times ...) How do you know that ? did you do a poll or something where *actual* users vote/tell ? From my point of view, i wouldn't want to write a high level management toolstack in C, specially since the API is well defined JSON which is easily available in all high level language out there.