On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:24:51AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:17PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> There is unfortunately a pretty prevalent
>> segfault in the latest libvirt. If a qemu
>> domain is defined without an emulator
>> specified, libvirtd crashes.
>>
>> This is doubly unfortunate since current
>> virtinst generates an emulator-less config
>> for all qemu and kvm guests (I'm about to fix
>> this upstream though).
>
> #%(*&#@(%@. Damn. This is worthy of a brown paper bag release for libvirt
> to fix this shockingly bad bug.
>
If we are going to do this I'd really like to get the
2 pending max vcpu patches committed, since it's a
big issue that we largely disallow smp kvm guests
at this moment.
Do you need more reviews ? I didn't realized we had pending unapplied
patches ... Repost if necessary, thanks !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/