Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v1 07/11] virStoragePoolObjListAdd: Separate out definition assignment
On 8/19/19 6:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
Was it intentional to swap the order?
That's a good question. Honestly, I don't recall. I'll fix it in my
local branch. It looks like we should set the new pool definition with
the pool list locked so that virStoragePoolObjIsDuplicate() and
virStoragePoolObjSourceFindDuplicate() can return expected value if two
threads were fighting.
Michal