On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:46:33AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 6/17/19 9:15 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 01:19 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 03:17:22PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> Since its introduction in v0.8.0~314 we allowed for cppi to be
>>> not present for 'syntax-check' because the package did exist in
>>> Fedora Core 12. Well, we don't care anymore ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>> All recent distros have it. Moreover, it's fairly easy to miss
>>> 'cppi not installed' message in sea of syntax-check output (esp.
>>> for newbies who probably benefit from it the most).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> cfg.mk | 32 ++++++++++++--------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
>
> According to [1], only Fedora and FreeBSD have cppi packaged, so
> merging this patch will make 'make syntax-check' suddenly fail on
> all other target platforms.
>
> I agree that the current situation is suboptimal, though. How about
> we keep cppi optional, but print a more visible message about it not
> being available after going through all syntax-check rules? That way
> it'd be definitely more difficult to miss.
>
>
> [1]
https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-jenkins-ci.git;a=blob;f=guests/vars/ma...
>
Oh, you're right. I did not realize that cppi is not on CentOS and some
other funky distros. So I guess our only option is to make the error
message more visible, e.g. some banner?
**********************
* cppi not installed *
**********************
Yeah, you can also add it to BuildRequires and check for it during configure as
warning there would be more visible, I guess. You can also require it only where you know
it is available, but it might be too harsh.
Just my $.02
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list