On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:34:14PM -0400, David Lively wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:51 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:33:45AM -0400, David Lively wrote:
> > After making the change I suggested above, it now feels a little strange
> > because "Pool" is gone from the name. I'm starting to think
> > "*Discover[Storage]PoolSources*" is the only good choice. It's
rather
> > long, but makes it clear we're talking about storage pool sources (as
> > opposed to "storage sources", which feels a little ambiguous, or
> > "storage pools" which isn't accurate since they're not (yet)
pools).
>
> Discover is a bit of a long word - lets use 'Find' instead, so it makes
> the API name a little shorter - and no worse than our existing longest
> API name. In other words:
>
> virConnectFindStoragePoolSources()
Sounds good. The attached patch uses this name (and others consistent
with it), and should implement all the suggestions from Daniel V and Jim
M.
Excellant work - I've committed all this to CVS before we change our
minds on naming yet again :-)
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|