On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:44:14 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:15:17AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 2/26/20 8:33 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 15:32:46 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > > Reject unsupported configurations.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> > > index c3fc3fed1c..7cb283123d 100644
> > > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> > > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> > > @@ -8266,10 +8266,44 @@ qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateIOMMU(const
virDomainIOMMUDef *iommu,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > +static int
> > > +qemuDomainDefValidateVirtioFSSharedMemory(const virDomainDef *def)
> > > +{
> > > + size_t numa_nodes = virDomainNumaGetNodeCount(def->numa);
> > > + size_t i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < numa_nodes; i++) {
> >
> > This won't catch guests with no numa configured ...
> >
Consider this squashed in:
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
index 090720fd76..f992e3fc6e 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
@@ -8276,6 +8276,12 @@ qemuDomainDefValidateVirtioFSSharedMemory(const virDomainDef
*def)
size_t numa_nodes = virDomainNumaGetNodeCount(def->numa);
size_t i;
+ if (numa_nodes == 0) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
+ _("virtiofs requires one or more NUMA nodes"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < numa_nodes; i++) {
virDomainMemoryAccess node_access =
virDomainNumaGetNodeMemoryAccessMode(def->numa, i);
We have a similar requirement for either cpu or memory hotplug so:
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>
Ideally guests instantiated via virt-install should already come with ne
numa node, but that's for another time.