Michal Privoznik wrote:
==11260== 1,006 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record
106 of 111
==11260== at 0x4C2AE5F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:297)
==11260== by 0x4C2BDFF: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:693)
==11260== by 0x4EA430B: virReallocN (viralloc.c:245)
==11260== by 0x4EA7C52: virBufferGrow (virbuffer.c:130)
==11260== by 0x4EA7D28: virBufferAdd (virbuffer.c:165)
==11260== by 0x4EA8E10: virBufferStrcat (virbuffer.c:718)
==11260== by 0x42D263: xenFormatXLDiskSrcNet (xen_xl.c:960)
==11260== by 0x42D4EB: xenFormatXLDiskSrc (xen_xl.c:1015)
==11260== by 0x42D870: xenFormatXLDisk (xen_xl.c:1101)
==11260== by 0x42DA89: xenFormatXLDomainDisks (xen_xl.c:1148)
==11260== by 0x42EAF8: xenFormatXL (xen_xl.c:1558)
==11260== by 0x40E85F: testCompareParseXML (xlconfigtest.c:105)
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
Strange function name in $subject. s/xenFoxenFormatXLDisk/xenFormatXLDisk/
ACK.
Regards,
Jim
---
src/xenconfig/xen_xl.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_xl.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_xl.c
index 18d9fe369..2c9174e53 100644
--- a/src/xenconfig/xen_xl.c
+++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_xl.c
@@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ xenFormatXLDisk(virConfValuePtr list, virDomainDiskDefPtr disk)
int format = virDomainDiskGetFormat(disk);
const char *driver = virDomainDiskGetDriver(disk);
char *target = NULL;
+ int ret = -1;
/* format */
virBufferAddLit(&buf, "format=");
@@ -1119,12 +1120,12 @@ xenFormatXLDisk(virConfValuePtr list, virDomainDiskDefPtr disk)
tmp->next = val;
else
list->list = val;
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
cleanup:
VIR_FREE(target);
virBufferFreeAndReset(&buf);
- return -1;
+ return ret;
}