On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 15:17:50 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 13:47:50 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:42:50PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
qemu's event has following format:
{ "timestamp": { "seconds": 1435580974, "microseconds": 82226 }, "event": "SPICE_INITIALIZED", "data": { "server": { "auth": "none", "port": "5900", "family": "ipv4", "host": "127.0.0.1" }, "client": { "port": "53224", "family": "ipv4", "channel-type": 3, "connection-id": 1113096064, "host": "127.0.0.1", "channel-id": 0, "tls": false } } }
Our code tried to extract the "service" field but qemu reports it as "port".
Hmm, that's somewhat odd - did you check back historical versions of QEMU where this event was first introduced to see if it has always had this name ? It smells like the kind of thing that could have been a regression at some point
Actually the regression would be on the VNC side, since VNC uses "service" and the function that I've modified handles both. I failed to notice that fact at first.
Heh, I was thinking "service" was an old downstream-only spelling of "port" and checked it wasn't the case. But I failed to notice the same handler is used for VNC too... Jirka