On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:32:19 +0200, Daniel Veillard <veillard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:46:28PM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> From: Nikunj A. Dadhania <nikunj(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add support in the lxc driver for various memory controllable parameters
>
> v4:
> + prototype change: add unsigned int flags
>
> v2:
> + Use #define string constants for "hard_limit", etc
> + fix typo: min_guarantee
>
> Acked-by: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A. Dadhania <nikunj(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[...]
> + if (vm == NULL) {
> + char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
> + virUUIDFormat(dom->uuid, uuidstr);
> + lxcError(VIR_ERR_NO_DOMAIN,
> + _("No domain with matching uuid '%s'"),
uuidstr);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
Hum, the qemu driver was reporting
if (vm == NULL) {
qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
_("No such domain %s"), dom->uuid);
goto cleanup;
}
the 2 should be harmonized I guess, but since the LXC reporting is better
I left this as a TODO, seems that's a more general cleanup needed between
drivers.
Let me look at this and I will provide a patch.
> + for (i = 0; i < nparams; i++) {
> + virMemoryParameterPtr param = ¶ms[i];
> +
> + if (STREQ(param->field, VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_HARD_LIMIT)) {
> + int rc;
> + if (param->type != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_FIELD_ULLONG) {
> + lxcError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, "%s",
> + _("invalid type for memory hard_limit tunable,
expected a 'ullong'"));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + rc = virCgroupSetMemoryHardLimit(cgroup, params[i].value.ul);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + virReportSystemError(-rc, "%s",
> + _("unable to set memory hard_limit
tunable"));
> + }
> + } else if (STREQ(param->field, VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_SOFT_LIMIT)) {
> + int rc;
> + if (param->type != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_FIELD_ULLONG) {
> + lxcError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, "%s",
> + _("invalid type for memory soft_limit tunable,
expected a 'ullong'"));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + rc = virCgroupSetMemorySoftLimit(cgroup, params[i].value.ul);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + virReportSystemError(-rc, "%s",
> + _("unable to set memory soft_limit
tunable"));
> + }
> + } else if (STREQ(param->field, VIR_DOMAIN_SWAP_HARD_LIMIT)) {
> + int rc;
> + if (param->type != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_FIELD_ULLONG) {
> + lxcError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, "%s",
> + _("invalid type for swap_hard_limit tunable, expected
a 'ullong'"));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + rc = virCgroupSetSwapHardLimit(cgroup, params[i].value.ul);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + virReportSystemError(-rc, "%s",
> + _("unable to set swap_hard_limit
tunable"));
> + }
> + } else if (STREQ(param->field, VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MIN_GUARANTEE)) {
> + lxcError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
> + _("Memory tunable `%s' not implemented"),
param->field);
> + } else {
> + lxcError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
> + _("Parameter `%s' not supported"),
param->field);
> + }
> + }
> + ret = 0;
Same problem of error reporting as in the QEmu driver, I moved ret = 0;
before the loop and et ret = -1; on all errors !
One clarification:
Will it return error back immediately if an error occurs?
Or will it try setting all of them one by one and if anyone of them succeed,
success is returned.
> +cleanup:
> + if (cgroup)
> + virCgroupFree(&cgroup);
> + if (vm)
> + virDomainObjUnlock(vm);
> + lxcDriverUnlock(driver);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
After those modifications, ACK, applied to my tree,
Thanks
Nikunj