On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:39:39AM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 11/07/2017 17:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 16:42, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Concerning QEMU, could we maybe simply emit a warning a la
> > > >
> > > > "you did not specify a machine type with the -M option, so you
are
> > > > currently running the the 'pc' machine type. Please note
that
> > > > future
> > > > versions of QEMU might use the 'q35' machine type instead.
If you
> > > > require the 'pc' machine type for your setting, then
please specify
> > > > it with the -M option."
> > > Warnings tend to get ignored until things are actually break, so I
> > > don't think this helps much. I think simply not having a default
> > > machine type (as already suggested elsewhere in this thread) is the
> > > best way to deal with this.
> > I would absolutely hate this. One of the nice things about qemu has
> > always been that 'qemu disk.img' is enough to start a simple VM. You
> > only need to touch any other options for things you care about. I
> > wouldn't want to give this up.
>
> I agree. Don't change anything, leave "-M pc" aside, and let
libosinfo
> pick q35 for newer guests.
>
Hi Paolo,
While I do think it would be a good step moving forward, I am not
convinced is "enough" to get more users using it. More so, a low
level bug in upper layers (e.g. Open stack) will lead to difficulty
to debug and result in the same "The machine is not steady enough,
it doesn't worth the effort, let's move back to pc", or even
frustration of the people that really need Q35.
I guess not being enough depends on which users we want to
affect. People who run QEMU from the command-line don't get a
virtio drive or a modern CPU model chosen by default, either. Is
the choice of machine-type different? Why?
[...]
--
Eduardo