Re: [Libvir] Re: Next features and target for development

Dan Smith wrote:

AL> It completely ignores issues like authentication and AL> authorization.

Excellent point. For that reason, a libvirt connection to the remote makes sense to me.

AL> virDomainSend(dom, "url://....");

Don't you not want a connection to the remote machine here?

Sure. Regards, Anthony Liguori

virDomainSend(dom, rconn, "url://...");

AL> Such an interface could easily support checkpointing, save, AL> resume, etc.

AL> If you wanted to introduce a higher level interface for Migrate and AL> Checkpoint, that would be fine too provided it just used these lower AL> level functions and constructed appropriate URIs.

I'm quite happy with that... :)