On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:47:24PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/27/2015 04:38 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>>>> This reverts commit 1ce7c1d20cfd5afb26d2dbc88201085d52415d0e,
>>>>> which introduced a significant semantic change to the
>>>>> virDomainGetInfo() API. Additionally, the change was only
>>>>> made to 2 of the 15 virt drivers.
>>>>>
>>>> I guess we should probably do this in the stable branch too, since I
>>>> think it made it into the most recent release.
>>>>
>>> Erm, the change is out for a while now:
>>>
>>> git desc 1ce7c1d20cfd5afb26d2dbc88201085d52415d0e
>>> v1.2.6-225-g1ce7c1d
>>>
>>
>> Oh yes, so it is. I'm still inclined to say we should be reverting it as
>> I think it is wrong. The change was based on the misleading field name
>> shown by virsh. The info->memory field shows the current balloon target,
>> and conceptually this should be equal to the max memory if the ballooon
>> driver is not active. As such I think it should be equal to max memory
>> if shutoff too.
>>
>
> Yikes, I forgot to commit this before leaving for travel/vacation. Is it
> still ok to commit to master? And just to be clear, then cherry pick to
> 1.2.7-1.2.18 maint branches?
Yes, that sounds like the best way to handle it.
Agreed
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|