On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:42:31PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
Hi, Daniel
Thank you for reviewing.
About xenHypervisorSetSchedulerParameters() in case of credit scheduler.
I just set not changed parameter at first.
I guess no problem on this.
Any problem?
+ /* credit scheduler parameters
+ * following values do not change the parameters
+ */
+ op_dom.u.getschedinfo.u.credit.weight = 0;
+ op_dom.u.getschedinfo.u.credit.cap = (uint16_t)~0U;
yes I have seen that, but I wonder what happens when only one parameter
is not 0, does the hypercall set only that parameter ?
That does no prevent pushing that first version but that something which
should be double checked to avoid catastrophic behaviour on edge cases.
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/