Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] C#Bindings patch, rename classes
?I just found "Error" too large for the person who will use C# bindings :S
but... I can use Error, technically no problem.
PS : I don't know exactly the english word, by too large I just want to
avoid confusion
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:21 PM
To: <arnaud.champion(a)devatom.fr>
Cc: <libvir-list(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] C#Bindings patch, rename classes
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:07:45PM +0200, arnaud.champion(a)devatom.fr
wrote:
> ?Okay, I'll make the change... Currently at naming level, my problem is
> around Error class. Do you have a suggestion ?
What's wrong with following the example I gave, eg
namespace Libvirt [
public class Error {
...
> >
> >IMHO
> >
> >namespace LibvirtBindings
> >{
> > public class virDomain
> > {
> > ....
> >
> >Is somewhat redundant and better named
> >
> >namespace Libvirt
> >{
> > public class Domain
> > {
> > ....
> >
> >
> >The 'vir' prefix on C library APIs/structs is just a hack because C
> >does not have any concept of namespaces. It shouldn't be copied into
> >languages which do have proper namespace support
> >
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B
9505 :|