On 08/10/2011 11:05 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/09/2011 11:45 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> This should have been done with the rest of the patch for virtual
> switch / network device abstraction.
And I should have called you on this before the 0.9.4 release - oh
well :)
A long time ago I used to like writing documentation. I think the
language center of my brain has atrophied in the last 20 years, though...
> + A portgroup provides a method of easily putting guest
> + connections to the network into different classes, with each
> + class potentially having a different level/type of service. Each
> + network can have multiple portgroup elements (and one of those
> + can optionally be designated as the 'default' portgroup for the
> + network), and each portgroup has a name, as well as various
> + subelements associated with it. The currently supported
> + subelements are<code><bandwidth></code>
> + and<code><virtualport></code>, which are both fully
> + described in the domain XML documentation.
Is there any way to make cross-page relative links, so that you can
make this a link to the right section in the domain XML page?
I did this up earlier in my patch, and it seems to work:
(see<a href="formatdomain.html#elementsNICSDirect">Direct attachment to
physical interface</a> for descriptions of the various macvtap modes)
But I didn't think to put a link here too. I did that, tested it, fixed
a couple of formatting problems I didn't notice last night (missing ";"
and pushed the result.
But not a show-stopper to this patch if you aren't sure how.
ACK.
Thanks.