Re: [libvirt PATCH 2/4] m4: enable -fstack-protector-strong on mingw

On 7/22/20 1:21 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Historically we avoided -fstack-protector* since it resulted in a broken > build on Mingw. In GCC 10 in Fedora though, we have the opposite problem, > getting a broken build if we don't enable one of the -fstack-protector* > options. This also works in GCC 9, so we don't need to worry about the > old brokeness which evidentally got fixed at some time without noticing. ...and I guess there's no "super old" mingw releases that we need to worry about, since it's always the mingw on the current release of Fedora that's used (did I get that right?)