Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic
Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>>> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
>>>> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
>>>>
>>>> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
>>>> ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's
existence
>>>> in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
>> So it's isa-pvpanic meaning
"I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic"
>
> More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find
> anything that's utterly broken in the design".
>
> And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin
> pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible".
isa-pvpanic does not look like a sane way to say that.
NACK
You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
it can be me), don't you?
Paolo