On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:30:35PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 12/02/2011 01:42 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:11:24PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
But that means we really are committing to an rc2.
Definitely. For example there is apparently a problem with commit fa9595003d043df9f2efe95521c00898cef27106 that we ough to fix quickly too to allow further testing :-)
Daniel
The problem was caused by two threads that both were thinking they are having the buck and entering poll() which caused some clients to hang. It was possible due to a race condition and therefore was not 100% reproducible. It should be fixed now with: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00116.html
Indeed, the current git head works fine again for me, thanks a lot for chasing this :-) So I made an second release candidate available at: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/libvirt-0.9.8-rc2.tar.gz along with rpms, I also tagged git with it. Hopefully the builds on BSD and Windows should be fixed, it would be good if it could be tested on OsX and since there was a build done last month on Android, I wonder if this could be done again [1]. thanks everybody ! Daniel [1] maybe we should setup some cross compilation testing like for cygwin... -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/