On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:30:35PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 12/02/2011 01:42 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:11:24PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>>But that means we really are committing to an rc2.
>
> Definitely. For example there is apparently a problem with commit
>fa9595003d043df9f2efe95521c00898cef27106 that we ough to fix quickly too
>to allow further testing :-)
>
>Daniel
>
The problem was caused by two threads that both were thinking they
are having the buck and entering poll() which caused some clients to
hang. It was possible due to a race condition and therefore was not
100% reproducible. It should be fixed now with:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00116.html
Indeed, the current git head works fine again for me, thanks a lot
for chasing this :-)
So I made an second release candidate available at:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/libvirt-0.9.8-rc2.tar.gz
along with rpms, I also tagged git with it.
Hopefully the builds on BSD and Windows should be fixed, it would
be good if it could be tested on OsX and since there was a build done
last month on Android, I wonder if this could be done again [1].
thanks everybody !
Daniel
[1] maybe we should setup some cross compilation testing like for
cygwin...
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/