On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 14:20 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:14:04PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 13:38 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > We can actually chop the 'extra_release' bit out of the RPM spec
> > entirely, as it is only useful for automated CI builds.
>
> Neat. I assume you meant that we can avoid defining it when calling
> rpmbuild in the script, not that we want to remove it from the spec
> altogether, right? The latter can still be useful.
I did actually mean removing it from the RPM spec entirely - Fedora
reviewers have complained about it existing multiple times, but at
least in past I could justify it for CI purposes.
Not sure I agree, but I don't feel strongly enough to oppose the
change either :)
That IMHO puts it squarely into separate patch territory though,
so if you're okay with it I'll push this one as originally posted
and follow up with another that drops extra_release completely.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization