On 2014/9/8 21:05, Francesco Romani wrote:
This patch implements the VIR_DOMAIN_STATS_CPU_TOTAL
group of statistics.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani(a)redhat.com>
---
include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 1 +
src/libvirt.c | 9 ++++++++
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
[...]
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
index 2950a4b..cfc5941 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
#include "storage/storage_driver.h"
#include "virhostdev.h"
#include "domain_capabilities.h"
+#include "vircgroup.h"
Hi, Francesco.
I see the file including relationship. 'qemu_driver.c' includes
'qemu_cgroup.h' which
includes 'vircgroup.h'. There are other virCgroupGet* functions called in
qemu_driver.c
now. So I think here "include vircgroup.h" is not necessary.
#define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_QEMU
@@ -17338,6 +17339,55 @@ qemuDomainGetStatsState(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
}
+static int
+qemuDomainGetStatsCpu(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ virDomainObjPtr dom,
+ virDomainStatsRecordPtr record,
+ int *maxparams,
+ unsigned int privflags ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+ qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = dom->privateData;
+ unsigned long long cpu_time = 0;
+ unsigned long long user_time = 0;
+ unsigned long long sys_time = 0;
+ int ncpus = 0;
+ int err;
+
+ ncpus = nodeGetCPUCount();
+ if (ncpus > 0 &&
+ virTypedParamsAddUInt(&record->params,
+ &record->nparams,
+ maxparams,
+ "cpu.count",
+ (unsigned int)ncpus) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ err = virCgroupGetCpuacctUsage(priv->cgroup, &cpu_time);
+ if (!err && virTypedParamsAddULLong(&record->params,
+ &record->nparams,
+ maxparams,
+ "cpu.time",
+ cpu_time) < 0)
+ return -1;
+ err = virCgroupGetCpuacctStat(priv->cgroup, &user_time, &sys_time);
+ if (!err && virTypedParamsAddULLong(&record->params,
+ &record->nparams,
+ maxparams,
+ "cpu.user",
+ user_time) < 0)
+ return -1;
+ if (!err && virTypedParamsAddULLong(&record->params,
+ &record->nparams,
+ maxparams,
+ "cpu.system",
+ sys_time) < 0)
+ return -1;
1. If any of the 'err's is not zero, the function may returns 0 as success.
Is this the expected return? Or at least we can give a warning that we
miss some parameters.
2. I think it's better to report an error or warning log before return -1.
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
typedef int
(*qemuDomainGetStatsFunc)(virConnectPtr conn,
virDomainObjPtr dom,
@@ -17353,6 +17403,7 @@ struct qemuDomainGetStatsWorker {
static struct qemuDomainGetStatsWorker qemuDomainGetStatsWorkers[] = {
{ qemuDomainGetStatsState, VIR_DOMAIN_STATS_STATE, false },
+ { qemuDomainGetStatsCpu, VIR_DOMAIN_STATS_CPU_TOTAL, false },
{ NULL, 0, false }
};