Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] Implement variable length structure allocator
On 04/06/2010 06:59 AM, Dave Allan wrote:
> Then again, fixing the type for your new method would imply
fixing the
> typing of virAlloc and friends as well.
Daniel's arguments are convincing; it's okay to keep the ugly cast in
the implementation if it makes the header easier to use without having
to embed a cast in the #define.
Is everybody ok with having this allocator, btw?
You have my ACK, but I'm only a (small) fraction of everybody. But
since no one is using them yet, is it worth waiting until after 0.8.0 to
push?
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 323 bytes)